Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Spring floods bring one question: Why return?

By Jeff Orvis

Most of us have an idea of where we would live if we had our choice. It may be somewhere close to family. It may be a city that offers great shopping and opportunities to take part in great cultural events.

The late great singer, John Denver, convinced many fans that Colorado would be the ideal place to live. But those of us who are tired of snow probably aren't too keen on living in a place where it's still piling up, in the latter stages of April.

I've known people who seem most at peace when they get within a few miles of an ocean. Although it's been more than 40 years, I can still remember how my dad's mood seemed to improve the closer we got to a favorite lake in west central Minnesota where we sometimes vacationed, or north of Minneapolis, as we neared Duluth and the great Lake Superior.

These thoughts came to mind this week as we once again were visited by that nasty visitor who seems to sneak up on us this time of the year – spring flooding. As I write this on a Tuesday afternoon, River Drive in Davenport is under water at some stretches from Interstate 280 all the way to Interstate 74. In Illinois, residents are wrestling with the highest flood stage in the history of record keeping along the Rock River.

Hundreds of people in this area are being forced to leave homes along the area rivers and seek shelter on higher ground. Fifty mobile homes in a park in Illinois have been evacuated due to the threat of a breach in a levee. Rescue workers told the residents that if they didn't leave, their homes might be swept from their moorings and their vehicles could float away.

These scenes are repeated along various rivers all across the country every year. And in a majority of cases, the displaced residents wait for the water to recede and then return to their home, clean up the mess and start again. Only a few who were interviewed on local TV said that after experiencing this several times, they were giving up and making a permanent move to higher ground.

I have to say, it would only take one time for me and I would be looking for a place far away from the river edge. I grew up in the Mississippi Valley. But we lived on a hill, well above the river bank.

I had a brief first-hand experience with river bank dwellers when I lived Independence several years ago. A good friend finally moved out her parents' home and bought her first house a few blocks away, on the banks of the Wapsipinicon River. Much like our flood this year, the Wapsi rose rapidly one evening. I still remember walking hand in hand with her to her parents' house in knee-deep flood water in the dark to check on them. Then we went to her house and along with some other friends, quickly emptied her basement before the water invaded.

I realize that the river is a wonderful place to observe wildlife, to catch fish or watch barges go up and down the main channel. If you are a lover of nature or an avid fisherman, I suppose the idea of being able to roll out of bed every morning to a different view in the river's ever-changing landscape would be a draw. But we 
lived just a short drive down a hill to good fishing along Lock and Dam 14 at LeClaire.

For many people, like my Independence friend, it is a matter of economics. Buying that first house is usually a burden and you take great pride in ownership. But I could never see the wisdom in facing the real possibility that that investment could float away each spring.

Aside from the Boston Marathon bombing and the flood news in recent days, there was another disaster in Texas that boggles the mind. A fire and explosion in a fertilizer plant near Waco claimed 14 lives, injured many others and blew apart half of a small town. There were reports that there may have been more than a half-million pounds of ammonia nitrate stored at the plant, which was within walking distance of an apartment complex, at least one school and a nursing home.

Which brings to mind several questions: Who in their right mind would allow a plant producing some of the same material used in the bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City to be built so close to a populated area? If the reporst of the amount of ammonia nitrate prove to be accurate, how many state and federal agencies are to blame for allowing this to take place? Texas is a big state. Why couldn't this plant be built a few miles out of town?

In the wake of this tragedy, there were a few lighter moments for those of who have some familiarity with agriculture as we heard those big city network news types attempt to explain what anydrous ammonia is used for.

But those lighter moments were few and far between as we continued to wrestle with what otherwise was a pretty grim week on the national local news front.

No comments:

Post a Comment