Thursday, February 19, 2015

My thoughts on our tax system

By Jeff Orvis

Ever had the thought that if you could just stop time for an instant and fix things, life would be better? If you had the power to stop killing, find a cure for deadly diseases or perhaps go back in time and say some things to people who have come and gone from your life, things would be better.

Each year at this time, I think these things whenever I hear an ad on the radio for income tax preparation or see an interview with a tax consultant on what to do to ease a person's tax burden.There are even some misguided individuals who advocate the end of the Internal Revenue Service completely.

I'm a proud, card-carrying liberal. Many of us have been typecast as being in favor of taxes, as long as it's others who pay them. We are also supposed to be in favor of attorneys and accompanying lawsuits, as long as they are working for us. So I guess I don't exactly fit the mold of what others believe liberals are all about.
I am in favor of taxation and for more than 35 years, I paid my share of state and federal taxes while in the workforce. But even as I mailed off my tax returns and then anxiously watched the return mail for the next couple of months for that expected tax refund, I wondered what it would be like if I was rich enough to hire lawyers and accountants to shield a lot of my wealth from the government. Unfortunately, over the years, folks who thought the way I did were elected to state and national office, where it seems every year, they spend much of their time trying to decide not only how to spend the tax money collected, but how to cut taxes for some at the expense of others.

So I wonder what would happen if for just one moment, we could stop time and start all over with how we pay for the necessary services our government must provide. Yes, I am talking about a flat tax with no deductions. Anyone in the workforce making a minimum amount of money would pay the same percentage for taxes. There would be no deductions for medical expenses, mortgage payments, business losses, etc. If you made $500 in a week, the government would get the first cut. If you owned a store and you sold widgets, whatever those are, whatever profit you earned on the sale would be taxed the same as a factory worker, school teacher or corporate president. Although many members of Congress would like to dispute this, I'll bet if we suddenly had this system, we would all be amazed at what percentage we would all pay.

Many of us have had the dream of winning a big prize in a lottery or other such contest, with the thought that finally we might be able to help our less fortunate friends or relatives. But as I understand the current tax system, you are limited to how much you can give someone else before the government will come collecting an additional tax. If you pay the same percentage as if it was earned income when you first won the prize, isn't requiring an additional payment when you make a gift to someone double taxation?

Although I've made my case for equal taxation, there are two groups that come to mind that I would exempt from paying. Anyone on active duty in the armed forces should not have to pay income taxes. And anyone in retirement should also be exempt from income tax. Social Security payments should not be taxed. And anyone who has invested some of their money they have earned while working should not have any interest earnings taxed.

I realize that strict simplification of the tax system might cut into the profits of thousands of attorneys and accountants. We still need those people. I have had a couple of occasions to have contact with attorneys in the past few years and have been served well. And if I ever won the lottery, I would want to hire a good accountant to help me spend my winnings wisely. But I would still know that my winnings would be taxed fairly, without anyone trying to find ways to shield any of my winnings from government.

I am also not in favor of abolising the IRS. The agency would be drastically cut if the tax code was whittled down to a page or two. But there would still be need for a strong enforcement branch to make this theory work.

So I guess that's my “If I ruled the world” thought for today. Sometime I will entertain you on thoughts on what it would be like if I had the power to stop violence. But those theories are still a work in progress.

Friday, February 6, 2015

NFL Draft is big business

By Jeff Orvis

It's hard to believe that nearly a week has gone by since the Super Bowl. What started way back in August with the Hall of Fame preseason game ended on the first day of February. It was an okay game that wasn't decided until the final minute. While I was hoping Seattle would win, I wasn't totally dismayed with the win by the Patriots.

So now it would seem that we are left with six months before the start of the next football season. For hardcore NFL fans, there will be some hope in early May when Chicago hosts the NFL Draft. After those three days of determining well-paid human bondage, fans will have plenty to talk about before training camp.
Thanks to plenty of promotion by the league and wall-to-wall coverage by both ESPN and the NFL Network, the draft has turned into a real happening. City officials in Chicago are learning a little more each day just how big this event is. And amid reports of demands by the league on city officials, I hope they aren't sorry they won the right to host it.

Radio City Music Hall in New York has been the home of the draft for the past several years. But the league decided to give other cities a shot at hosting it and Chicago won this time around. According to a report this week in the Chicago Tribune, the draft isn't just a little TV show with a few hundred spectators. It is an event that will tie up a portion of the downtown for up to three weeks, complete with technical improvements to the old theater that will house the event to the tune of $100,000-$125,000, a pledge of police escorts for various league and team officials and draft prospects and the assurance that hundreds of hotel rooms will be available during the period.

The league is very protective of its brand. You are perhaps aware that there are strict rules about the use of the term “Super Bowl.” News accounts can refer to the championship game in this way, but supermarkets selling party foods for that day have to call it “the big game,” or something similar unless they pay royalties to the league. The NFL is also dictating what businesses can be open near the site of the draft and what products can be sold in view of the TV cameras covering the event. They had better be NFL-licensed products or the businesses can expect a visit from lawyers.

City officials are hoping that the exposure will be good for Chicago, that some youngster watching the draft from Belle Plaine, Iowa will convince his parents that the family needs to vacation in the Windy City. It is estimated the whole event, which will also include some sort of fan fair, concerts, etc., could cost up to $4 million. While the league and a Chicago organizing committee will pay part of the tab, the city could be liable for a good chunk of it. So there better be a few hundred thousand prospective vacationers impressed with what they see.

I am a big football fan. I hope my Bears can rebound and be a viable, championship-caliber team in a couple of years. But the league is facing plenty of problems, from poor behavior of some of its players, to the question of the long term effects of concussions on former players, to the lack of a pro team in Los Angeles and on and on. I just hope the league isn't using the draft as a smokescreen to make fans forget about these problems, for even a few days.