By Jeff Orvis
We've got about six months before we
decide who will be the leader of the free world for the next four
years. Now that the Republicans have somewhat unified and quit openly
criticizing each other the Democrats can declare “open season” on
Mitt Romney. It's going to be an interesting, brutal, wicked,
insanely expensive six months. We can only hope that the last man
standing won't be too bruised to lead us forward.
Both political parties seem to be
banking on the notion that since we all live in a world of sound
bytes, their message has to be brief and to the point and, hopefully,
accurate. If you believe Romney, then I'd better get my work clothes
rounded up, since I'll be assured of having a job on Jan. 21, 2013,
if he's elected.
Meanwhile, if Obama gets another term, the day after
this whole tax inequity question is answered, we will all be in a
better place, if you believe what he says.
One of the things that troubles me
about Mitt Romney is his pledge that more jobs will be created if
he's elected. There's that sound byte again. I have yet to hear
anyone challenge him on how this is going to happen. As near as I can
figure, his idea is to keep giving preferential tax treatment to the
wealthy. He apparently figures that the rich folks, out of the
goodness of their hearts, will use those tax savings to create jobs
for the rest of us.
Pardon me if I'm a bit skeptical.
We've seen this trickle down theory before and it just doesn't seem
to work. I don't begrudge anyone who strives to be able to live a
life of privilege. I just don't think that privileged life should be
paid for on the backs of the rest of us. But I also don't think the
government ought to penalize wealth with tax rates higher than the
rest of us pay.
It would seem to me the best way to
create jobs and reward business owners for job creation would be to
first of all close some tax loopholes, make such things as property
taxes on business property more equitable, then provide tax breaks to
business owners when they hire more Americans. Instead of giving them
the money up front in the form of unfair tax breaks, make them prove
they are serious about improving the American job climate, then
reward them for that good business sense.
A lot of us dream about what we'd do
if we suddenly came into more money than we would ever need. If the
folks from Publishers Clearing House come knocking on my door, I
admit my first thought would not be “how can I go into business and
hire a bunch of people?” I'd help family members, buy some things I
want, then invest the rest of it in something safe, sound and
conservative.
So if Romney is serious about this
more jobs promise, he'd better let us know how this is going to
happen. And it had better include something instead of simply cutting
taxes for his rich friends.
Romney is apparently starting to look
at who might be a suitable running mate. One word of caution for my
Republican friends. Dick C heney has a new heart. Remember how well
that went nearly a dozen years ago? Cheney was put in charge of a
committee to find a vice presidential running mate for W. After
several hours of exhaustive research, he had a devine revelation that
he would be the ideal candidate. It will undoubtedly be years before
we discover the full extent of the damage shadowy figure may have
done when he was our vice president. At this writing, there might be
a battery of constitutional attorneys researching whether he could
run again as vice president. What a scary thought!
After the seemingly countless and
pointless serious of debates by the Republican presidental wannabes I
never thought I would say this. But I can't wait for the Obama-Romney
debates. Obama is a great orator. Romney is slick. Romney will
probably be armed with all sorts of economic statistics and
accusations. His shortcomings will probably emerge when the President
begins talking about world affairs.
How ever this turns out, we've only
got about six months before we find out. Then the next day, the two
parties will probably start looking ahead to 2016. Maybe it just
seems that it never ends....
Nobody starts a business to create jobs and provide health insurance. A business starts because the owner thinks and hopes he can make a profit. Hopefully, if the business does well, it can hire lots and lots of people as a result.
ReplyDeleteJust my 2 cents on this topic. We may not always agree, but GOOD COLUMN Jeff. I read them all!